﻿1
00:00:23,643 --> 00:00:25,382
CT “Excitation Test”, Part III

2
00:00:25,407 --> 00:00:34,638
As you know, inductor is a linear element but if its voltage exceeds a specific limit, the inductor is saturated and enters the non-linear area.

3
00:00:34,663 --> 00:00:39,119
What we mean by saturation of the inductor is the saturation of its core.

4
00:00:39,190 --> 00:00:48,900
In fact, when the voltage exceeds the threshold, the core loses its ability to pass more flux and so it is saturated and the inductor turns non-linear.

5
00:00:48,925 --> 00:00:57,718
But by drawing the saturation curve of a “CT”, you can see that there is also a non-linear area in the lower voltages.

6
00:00:57,750 --> 00:01:04,351
Up to now we have said that in higher voltages the inductor becomes excited and turns non-linear.

7
00:01:04,486 --> 00:01:10,017
To explain non-linear area in a lower voltage, the parallel circuit of a “CT” is drawn.

8
00:01:10,167 --> 00:01:20,838
In this parallel circuit, the turns ratio of the “CT” which is a transformer is “1:N”. “Rs” indicate the resistance of the “CT”.

9
00:01:20,989 --> 00:01:31,685
In the parallel branch, “Reddy” and “Rh” stand for Foucault and hysteresis losses of the coil and L stands for the magnetizing inductance of the “CT” secondary.

10
00:01:31,710 --> 00:01:44,372
To perform the excitation test, secondary of the “CT” is fed by voltage and check to see what non-linear element is causing the “CT” to show a non-linear behavior even in lower voltages.

11
00:01:44,409 --> 00:01:48,447
As mentioned before, the losses of core include Foucault and hysteresis.

12
00:01:48,472 --> 00:01:55,294
Therefore, to analyze the non-linear behavior of the transformer, we need to examine the Foucault and hysteresis losses.

13
00:01:55,319 --> 00:02:03,272
Foucault losses are caused by Eddy Current which occurs in the core segment because of time-varying flux in the core and voltage induction.

14
00:02:03,297 --> 00:02:10,621
Since the flux is directly dependent on the voltage, we can say that the Foucault losses are the result of a pure resistance.

15
00:02:10,697 --> 00:02:15,995
The relation of the Foucault losses is achieved through an empirical method and is as you can see:

16
00:02:16,012 --> 00:02:27,830
In this relation, “B” is the flux density which equals “V/f”. By substituting this relation, Foucault losses can be rewritten as Pf= V2/Re.

17
00:02:27,855 --> 00:02:39,302
From this relation it can be deduced that the Foucault losses are caused by a fixed resistance that are not dependent on voltage and cannot be the reason for the non-linear behavior of the transformer in lower voltages.

18
00:02:39,327 --> 00:02:45,443
So, it is only possible that the hysteresis losses are the reason for the non-linear behavior in the “CT”.

19
00:02:45,468 --> 00:02:49,758
Hysteresis losses occur in the core due to the residual magnetism.

20
00:02:49,783 --> 00:02:58,339
This means that passing of the magnetic flux through the metal core in a direction causes the core to be magnetized and turn into a weak magnet;

21
00:02:58,387 --> 00:03:07,541
so in the next half-cycle, a small amount of energy is lost to remove the magnetic effect of the previous half-cycle and this is being constantly repeated.

22
00:03:07,566 --> 00:03:13,870
The empirical relation of hysteresis is Ph= Kh * f * Bx

23
00:03:13,888 --> 00:03:19,973
The value of “x” depends on the material of the core and can vary from 1.5 to 2.5.

24
00:03:19,998 --> 00:03:28,978
Also, in this relation, “B” is the flux density which equals “V/f” and by substituting it, the Hysteresis losses can be rewritten as you can see:

25
00:03:29,003 --> 00:03:36,821
From the resulted relation, it is obvious that the hysteresis resistance is non-linear and dependent on the voltage of its two ends.

26
00:03:36,846 --> 00:03:43,097
The effect of this resistance in the total equivalent resistance of the “CT” in the lower voltages is significant.

27
00:03:43,122 --> 00:03:51,852
But from a specific voltage upwards, the effect of this resistance decreases and causes the “CT” current and voltage relation to approach linearity.

28
00:03:51,877 --> 00:03:58,566
This causes the relation between voltage and current to be non-linear in a specific range in the lower voltages.

